Which case addresses the requirement of advising a defendant during a traffic stop?

The case that addresses the requirement of advising a defendant during a traffic stop is Ohio v. Robinette. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that police officers are not required to inform a motorist that they are free to leave during a traffic stop, which directly relates to the requirement of advising a defendant. The decision highlighted the parameters of consent during searches conducted after a traffic stop and emphasized the need for clear communication regarding a person's freedom to terminate their interaction with law enforcement. This ruling has implications for how officers approach traffic stops and the information they must convey to individuals during these encounters, setting legal precedents on the rights of defendants.